User:MagdaOakewoman
- MagdaOakewoman (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
MagdaOakewoman
- MagdaOakewoman (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 24 2009, 17:10 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Director Magda (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by MagdaOakewoman (talk) 17
- 10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
The IP Address is posted on Orlady's comment page, where she answers someone (about 2/3 of the way down). In addition, there is reason to believe that she is Director Magda, as both women have trails elsewhere that indicate that they are one and the same person. Director Magda is the woman who is the Director of the amateur production "Read My Lips". There is an alteration in The Vagina Monologues made exclusively by her, in order to tout her amateur production (please see the discussion there, started by me).
I have come to these conclusions, as Orlady immediately attacked me when I started editing. Oddly, her attacks were extreme over-reactions, and she claimed that they were based on the fact that my Wiki name is similar to hers (apparently "Orlady" stands for Oak Ridge Lady). She immediately black-listed me as a "sock puppet" of some guy named Jockynam (or something like that). This spurred me to do some research on Orlady, since she takes the similarity in our names so seriously. Apparently there is good reason for this.
I do think that her continual vicious domination in here must stop, so I am definately in agreement with other users about this. This bullying is unconscionable and manipulative. How many other sock puppets she may have, I do not know. I am relatively certain of these three.
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
This is almost amusing -- well, not really. For the record, I have never seen a performance of the Vagina Monologues, I've never even been to Murfreesboro (much less logged in from a computer there), and I can't imagine why I would have logged out and posted "You should be banned from editing. You edit stuff that is trivial and unfounded." on my own user page. --Orlady (talk) 17:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by other users
New user EERVR.Jr (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) looks like another incarnation of MagdaOakewoman, based on the user's first edit at User talk:Doncram. --Orlady (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Before closing, see my note regarding User:EERVR.Jr. --Orlady (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- EERVR.Jr and Yonkinator (talk · contribs) are both sockpuppets of Jvolkblum, based on technical evidence. Is it possible that's who all of these accounts are? Dominic·t 18:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's possible, but I think it more likely that the two different sets of sockpuppets are ganging up on me. I initially reported both MagdaOakewoman and Yonkinator as suspected sockpuppets of Jvolkblum, but it now appears that I was mistaken, as it is more likely that the MagdaOakewoman socks are a separate eruption that just happens to have decided to seek common cause with the Jvolkblum socks. It looks like I made a second mistake in identifying EERVR.Jr with MagdaOakewoman rather than Jvolkblum. --Orlady (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- I will not look at this case until MagdaOakewoman provides some diffs. —— nixeagleemail me 17:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Don't bother. For future reference, making a sockpuppet investigation request with a day-old account is just about one of the most obvious tip-offs you can give that you are in fact a sockpuppet yourself. So, I can say it is Confirmed that MagdaOakewoman is the same as Audreetucker (talk · contribs) and Advocate4us (talk · contribs). Orlady wasn't checked, of course. Dominic·t 17:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Blocked and tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |