Krzyzowiec
- Krzyzowiec (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Krzyzowiec
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Krzyzowiec (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- DumnyPolak (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by M0RD00R
User:Krzyzowiec banned for one year pending this discussion [1] is back under new username User:DumnyPolak
Evidence
- 1.Similar scope of the articles - Poland and European far right, Catholicism.
- 3. Similar arguments regarding some fringe Polish neo-Nazi group: ONR members can't be Nazi because their ancestors fought nazis (Krzyzowiec), How it is a 'neo-nazi movement' when it is related to the pre war organization which fought the Nazis?!) (DumnyPolak)
- 4.Similar incivil attacks on opponents stop spreading your hateress among normal and patriotic people. (Krzyzowiec), Stop POVing the article with your anti-Catholic hateress (DumnyPolak)
- 5.IP 151.204.133.206 active during Krzyzowiec block displayed similar behaviour characteristics: similar topics, similar soapboxing and racial innuendoes at talk pages [4]
Keeping in mind a history of racially charged soapboxing like this [5], [6] by DumnyPolak, IP 151.204.133.206 [7] and openly racist edits previously by Krzyzowiec, indef should be considered I guess. M0RD00R (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions
25 January 2013
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Kaskusia (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Return to perrenial edit warring at National Radical Camp (1993) (revision history; please note: user Kaskusia made 17 reverts since January 12, 2013 without summaries, in a slow-mo edit war with several long-term users including admins); see also: talk page warning by Drmies, talk page warning by Diannaa. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC) — An indef block was already proposed in 2008 by EdJohnston. Poeticbent talk 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Check declined by a checkuser - Krzyzowiec's edits are long Stale, so there's nothing for CU to compare against. Any determination will have to be made on behavioral evidence alone. —DoRD (talk) 20:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Seems pretty clear. Indefing both sock and master due to persistent disruption. Tagging and closing. Rschen7754 09:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)