JP8077
- JP8077 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
29 September 2016
Suspected sockpuppets
- MarxistAtheist991 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Adding Category:British social commentators to articles, very similar to sockpuppet User:AtheismAnarchist887. [1] [2] Sro23 (talk) 22:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, my block was up and I was free to create another account. However, did I add the category to any article that wasn't synonymous with the category? How can you accuse me of abusing this account? MarxistAtheist991 (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Don't you understand that you were blocked as an individual? You can't just create a new sockpuppet account. If you don't want to be blocked anymore, request an unblock on your original JP8077 account. Sro23 (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
How could I get that when I was blocked indefinitely? I was under the impression once I was blocked indefinitely I could no longer edit on my original account. Anyway, now I have a block on the original account I just want to start over again, cheers. MarxistAtheist991 (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Well that was easy.
Blocked but awaiting tags. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Easy indeed. Tagged and closing. MarxistAtheist991 You can only request an unblock through your first account (JP8077), just follow the instructions in the block notice. GABgab 03:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
16 October 2016
Suspected sockpuppets
- Sciencenut877 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Addition of similar categories to the same articles as previous socks. This person uses one account to add one category and a new account to add another one. examples: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Sro23 (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The following accounts are
Confirmed:
- Sciencenut877 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WarriorforAtheism777 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- HardcoreAtheist555 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
12 November 2016
Suspected sockpuppets
- Enjoyyourlife111 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Re-created Category:Kidnapped Northern Irish people, which has twice been created by socks, edits to Pat Condell, a sock target: [9] [10] [11], overall adds categories the same way all other socks have in the past Sro23 (talk) 02:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
08 December 2016
Suspected sockpuppets
- AntitheistAtheist1000 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Username + continuing the pattern of creating a new account to add new categories to the same pages. [12] [13] [14] [15] Sro23 (talk) 19:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
08 January 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- Andromeda811 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Like previous socks, this appears to be a new account created in order to add dubious categories (in this case, relating to Nihilism) to accounts. As with previous accounts, this user describes themself as an anarchist, an atheist, an antitheist and a nihilist. Although there is no individual edit which clearly demonstrates the identity, there is a similar username to several confirmed socks, a very similar pattern of editing, a militant anti-religious attitude, and an interest in Irish issues. To me, this is quacking loudly. RolandR (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged based on behavior. I see no justification for a CU; nor does the filer explain why one is needed. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
03 July 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- ResidentofPlanetEarth (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JohnfromLondon (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Both are now blocked as CU confirmed and tagged. Doug Weller talk 13:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
07 July 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- JustaguyontheInternet (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
JustaguyontheInternet was registered two days after the previous sock, ResidentofPlanetEarth, was indeffed. JustaguyontheInternet is doing the same things: creating dubious categories and filling them. Especially noticeable is the practice of JustaguyontheInternet following up on edits made by confirmed socks ResidentofPlanetEarth and JohnfromLondon. (Example 1.[16][17] Example 2.[18][19] Example 3.[20][21] Example 4.[22][23]) I don't think checkuser is necessary since the behavior is conclusive. Binksternet (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
11 August 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- HelloMyNameIsStephen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Same category behavior... like re-creating Category:20th-century English male comedians and such. All of these categories had been deleted by G5 only last month. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed to JustaguyontheInternet from the archive. He just created the sleeper Amateurastronomer779 as well. Both now blocked and tagged.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
02 September 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- Hercules9050 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Just like the sockpuppets in the archive, the user has a similar focus on categories [24] [25], and even re-created deleted categories such as Category:Northern Irish emigrants to Canada and Category:Northern Irish murder victims Sro23 (talk) 18:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- If it quacks like a duck... Binksternet (talk) 20:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: @Sro23: You can go ahead and self-endorse your own CU requests (just like requesting admin action). GABgab 20:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, sometimes I forget that, and sometimes it's just nice to have a second opinion. Sro23 (talk) 21:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - For sleepers, since this account is somewhat old. Please compare to socks in the archive. Sro23 (talk) 21:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
In progress - Katietalk 13:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed plus DrunkenIrishman819 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Blocked, tagged, closing. Katietalk 13:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
21 October 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- Volví (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Identical creation of Category:21st-century English women comedians and Category:21st-century English male comedians like last time. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
Clerk endorsed please compare to socks in the archive as previous checks have revealed sleepers. Sro23 (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed plus Cosmologygeek (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Closing. GABgab 19:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
03 April 2018
Suspected sockpuppets
- Oh hi there again (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
New account, immediately jumps into recategorising in articles; cf. INC's category work (ctrl+F "Category"). Also note both accounts working on comedians, stand-ups, etc. As for the name; well. INC isn't exactly shy when it comes to self-satire. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap shit room 13:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks DoRD; it was just pointed out to me before you blocked that JP8 was the more likely. Can't reveal my sources ;) but what a dead-eye. Cheers! —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap shit room 13:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: Sadly, cases like these rely on some institutional knowledge of recognizing the pattern of behavior and remembering the name of the ne'er-do-well in question. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Unrelated.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)