Bowjangles
- Bowjangles (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
25 November 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Robocop729 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Heilanpol (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Bowjangles continued to remove the affiliation of Boston University from the infobox and the introduction of the article. After he was opposed by three other legitimate editors at the talk page, two new accounts (Robocop729 and Heilanpol) were created in order to support Bowjangles position on the talk page and remove the information and references from the article. AnupamTalk 23:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Did a check to see if this was socking or meatpuppetry. Robocop729 and Heilanpol are Technically indistinguishable and it's technically Possible to Likely that they are controlled by Bowjangles. Add in the behaviour and I'd be inclined to say yes they are. WilliamH (talk) 06:59, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Socks blocked and tagged, master blocked one week. Courcelles 19:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
13 December 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Rarariot99 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
User:Bowjangles has already been blocked for sockpuppetry at the Boston University article for abusing three other socks, i.e. User:Robocop729, User:Heilanpol, and User:Rabbitvibe7 (please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bowjangles/Archive). User:Rarariot99 created his account during the dispute, on 4 December 2011 and made his first talk page comment at Talk:Boston University, in a similar format as User:Bowjangles and his sock, supporting their position. AnupamTalk 23:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Possibly, though the other edits the sock made seem incongruous. Endorsing to clarify. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed:
- Robocop729 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Heilanpol (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bowjangles (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Rabbitvibe7 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Rarariot99 is Likely. –MuZemike 22:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note All the confirmed socks were already blocked and tagged, but I blocked and tagged Rarariot. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)