Akshata Sen
- Akshata Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
22 July 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Akshata Dev (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Re-creation of a previously speedy-deleted (autobiographical) article with the same content. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two named accounts are Confirmed matches. TNXMan 14:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
02 August 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Tanushri Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Akshata Dev (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tanushree sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Both accounts are being used for promotional purposes. IP welcomed sock1 with the name of "Akshata Sen" Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Another sock, Akshata Dev, was blocked after an SPI in July. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 07:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Block evasion. Materialscientist blocked "Tanushri Sen" today, who, along with an IP, is a sockpuppet of "Akshata Sen" and "Akshata Dev". Have to have rangeblock over here Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Here we go. The following are Confirmed matches to each other:
- Tanushree Mitra (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tanushri Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tanushree sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MoonMooon Bose (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tanushri Mitra (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Soumita Roy (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Moonmoon Mitra (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Moonmoon Basu (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Shoumita Ray (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MonMon Basu (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Shoumeeta Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Akshata Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dimpy Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Anweasha Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dimmpy (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MoonMoon Bose (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Pratiksha Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dimpishta (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dimpy Dev Sen (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) TNXMan 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ (t) (e) 14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
27 August 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Daminy (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
The original account was used for creating hoax articles with invalid references. The article Anushka Sen created by User:Daminy seems to be a hoax as well. -Managerarc™ talk 18:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed - Probably, but endorsing to confirm. There were a lot of sleepers last time, so let's see if those can be found too. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll call this one Confirmed, while encouraging someone to take another look, as the range is very busy. Courcelles 20:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- There is also a bit of anonymous IP spamming of the same nature. Not sure if a rangeblock is a good idea, either. –MuZemike 20:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
04 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Bhumy (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
User created another hoax article Anushka Mukherjee. Is it possible to put a rangeblock on the 182.178 ip? -Managerarc™ talk 09:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed - Endorsing to confirm. Based on what Muzemike said last time, we may not be able to do a rangeblock here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note Blocked and tagged. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
05 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 17any (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
New SPA 17any created twice Anushka Mukherji, speedy deleted and retagged for speedy, and removed speedy tag. IPs removed speedy tags.Racconish Tk 08:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Racconish Tk 08:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- This isn't really a sockpuppet, it is just the user's IPs editing the page. Rcsprinter (talk) 11:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree this is a fringe case. Nevertheless, there is a pattern of making the problematic edits under IP.Racconish Tk 11:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. How can this be sanctioned? Rcsprinter (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems feasible. Rcsprinter (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree this is a fringe case. Nevertheless, there is a pattern of making the problematic edits under IP.Racconish Tk 11:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Administrator note I've merged the 17any case into this one; it's clearly Akshata Sen. I've also salted the Mukherjee article. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note I've also blocked 17any and the two IPs. We're done for now. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
10 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Olalla (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Account used for creating hoax article Roshni Mukherjee. -Managerarc™ talk 12:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Administrator note CU is unnecessary here; I've blocked and tagged. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
13 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Kakara 789 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Dimple Mukherjee -Managerarc™ talk 15:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
A Likely match to Olalla (talk · contribs), who was previously blocked as a sock. TNXMan 16:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
15 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Dispota 123 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Same type of fake article with fake refs. Sleeper check would be appreciated, as also the possibility of pouring a load of cement on the IP range if feasible. —SpacemanSpiff 12:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No apparent sleepers and a rangeblock is, unfortunately, not possible due to the high collateral. TNXMan 15:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Administrator noteAlready blocked and tagged, so marking for close, see you tomorrow.—SpacemanSpiff 16:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
16 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Dispota poppo (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
We meet again today. Sleeper check please. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 07:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Declined. Block the ducks on sight, and request CU only where there is ambiguity. AGK [•] 12:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Clerk note: last sleeper check was day before this was filed, little point in doing another now. Many thanks for reporting, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)