September 23
File:RebusEscortCardsCirca1865.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. A photograph of an out-of-copyright two-dimensional work may not be protected under American copyright law. Diannaa (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:RebusEscortCardsCirca1865.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The images of the cards themselves are presumably out of copyright. However, the photograph made of the cards was taken from ebay, it was not made by the user who uploaded the photograph and its exif data indicates that it was made five years ago and thus even if the author has died it is well within the term of life + several decades term provided by most countries. It is my understanding that a photograph, even of a non-copyrighted object, is itself a copyrighted work and permission to use has not been noted on the file page. Waerloeg (talk) 01:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep -- The act of putting three scans in vertical alignment to fit within a rectangle does not count as "creative" under copyright law, and as for the rest, see Bridgeman v Corel and Template:PD-Art... -- AnonMoos (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Corky the Hornet at a football game.jpg
File:Screen shot me.jpg.png
File:Faculty and First Daughters of Charity, Colegio de la Inmaculada Concepcion de la Concordia (Manila).jpg
File:Film Talk Cover.gif
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Film Talk Cover.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claims to have freely licensed this image, but it is a derivative work of several presumably non-free film stills. Therefore I don't think the uploader had the right to release it under a free content licence. (I contacted them a week ago to discuss this, but they have not responded. As with the uploader's other uploades, I suspect the OTRS ticket says nothing about the rights to reproduce the film stills.) Since the image contains non-free elements, it needs a fair use rationale. But it is not used in any articles, so it should be deleted. Psychonaut (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- On 23 September I posted an OTRS query and the uploader was asked to clarify the copyright status of the film stills. There was no response. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.