- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. That it is an interesting read is not relevant. I'm also not sure it was clear to everyone that the user whose space this is in has been blocked for nearly four years, so this is definently a stale draft as well as apparently being a recreation of material that was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
User:Burgas00/Spanish Gibraltarians
- User:Burgas00/Spanish Gibraltarians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete per the consensus at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ecemaml/Spanish Gibraltarians and per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Cunard (talk) 23:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It's an interesting read. I'm not convinced it would be verifiable as an article, but that material could be useful for a better cited future draft. G. C. Hood (talk) 03:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This thing is like whack-a-mole. Has anyone checked to see if there is evidence of socking here? Gigs (talk) 05:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAKEARTCILE. There's nothing in this page that's suitable for an actual encyclopedia page. Achowat (talk) 14:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.