- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Soft Delete . — xaosflux Talk 04:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
User:Allycat1208/Hope Witsell
- User:Allycat1208/Hope Witsell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 08:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
This one is a little tricky. The subject got media coverage and this is a tragic story. Does WP:BLP1E apply here? Is there good reason this page should be kept or deleted? I'm going to say Delete as inappropriately negative about the subject. Legacypac (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- BLP1E doesn't technically apply since the subject is not living or recently deceased, but given the subject matter a WP:COMMONSENSE-based argument isn't inappropriate. We (unfortunately) have List of suicides which have been attributed to bullying, which is a potential merge target. VQuakr (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at that list - nearly all the names have articles. That suggests mainspace it and include a link and summary in the list. Legacypac (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- I considered that, but there doesn't seem to ever have been a consensus on the talk page of that article to restrict the list to entries with articles. IMO Hope Witsell would not satisfy the requirements for a stand-alone article per WP:ONEEVENT, so better to merge it now and avoid a 2nd round of processing over in article space. VQuakr (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at that list - nearly all the names have articles. That suggests mainspace it and include a link and summary in the list. Legacypac (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Worth story to memorialise. Has meanings and learning. Is not an enclopedic topic. Refer to Wikipedia:Alternative outlets.
- NB. BLP* policy is not applicable to non living persons.
- Lists, if not notable lists, are only for listing notable topics. A merge to a list is not suitable unless others include entries like this in lists. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Merge usable content with Cyberbullying for historical value in resolving the problem. unsigned User:009o9 21:22, 25 April 2016.
- Delete, do not merge. Although reliably source, the source is primary source material for Cyberbullying, and so very unlikely to be wanted there, and the material contained is personal for several living private people in a way that Wikipedia works to avoid, unlike commercial media. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.