- Chulbul Pandey (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (article|XfD|restore)
Consensus wasn't determined. Plus the discussion was indicating to keep the article. So re-opening this discussion to get a clean and final consensus. DerevationGive Me Five 16:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've fixed the listing for you. I am having a little difficulty working out just what your request is. The article has never been deleted. The only deletion discussion here resulted in no-consensus, defaulting to keep, but that was 6 months ago. So just what are you asking for here? The content was merged as a result of this discussion though it wasn't very heavily attended. As this is an editorial decision not a deletion decision, the way to discuss unmerging would be to conduct a discussion on that talk page and see if a consensus can be reached. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy close. I have restored the article for review at Talk:Dabangg#Proposed merge with Chulbul Pandey, where I have started an RfC and notified the AfD participants to hopefully attract wider participation. Cunard (talk) 04:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|