- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Zine (weblog software)
- Zine (weblog software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software. Fails WP:N, WP:WEB, and WP:RS. Google returns nothing of interest. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 15:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Short answer: "I don't feel like arguing". (Have a look a [1]). FranklinPiat (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 18:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Two comments - (1) The word "zine" is popular in its own right, so any Google searches will be rife with noise-- more so if you search for "zine blog". (2) Looking at the official site, I'm a bit perplexed. It says it's written in Python, but it looks like a Wordpress clone of some sort. Not quite sure what to think. In any case, it probably doesn't meet our notability criteria. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 18:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ack. Just drop the page (I suppose it could be reverted/rewritten if the software becomes popular) FranklinPiat (talk) 09:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the name makes it difficult to search for soruces but using Zine with a various qualifiers doesn't turn up any sourcing that indicates notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is a useful reference to a useful piece of software. Vivelequebeclibre (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The software doesn't seem to meet the notability guidelines. — Rankiri (talk) 16:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.