- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
YouTube Debt
- YouTube Debt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced neologism, fails WP:NEO. Although the tag says the article has been unreferenced since April 2007, the article was just created. Movingboxes (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Although the article does actually contain references, they are not to reliable sources. Two of them are to YT videos and the last is to a non-reliable website that does not even contain the term. Furthermore, Google searches do not show any usage of the term. Therefore, the article is not verifiable. --N Shar (talk · contribs) 06:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable neologism. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A WP:NEO no-no. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO, as discussed above. Cliff smith talk 16:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NEO --T-rex 21:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, since we regretfully cannot accept self-published videos and blog websites as reliable sources. Kristen Eriksen (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted A lack of reliable references in a page that does not comply with WP:NEO, delete. -- iMatthew T.C. 22:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, of no relevance outside of the YouTube community. Esteffect (talk) 00:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, reasons have been stated. Jacina (talk) 12:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.