- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Y2Q
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Y2Q (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable buzzword about Quantum supremacy; I'm not convinced there's anything here to merge or that this is the primary topic for this acronym. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 08:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Marketing buzzword attributed to nebulous "experts". (Pop-science pieces copying each other in the search for a catchy hook does not indicate that scientists actually care. Note that Google Scholar turns up nothing relevant for "years to quantum", a good indicator of who if anyone is actually saying this.) In no way does this merit an entire article; nor does the content appear merge-worthy. XOR'easter (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.