- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite 01:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
William S. Schaill
- William S. Schaill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable author, no sources, the article was PRODded but the original author removed the PROD tag. Woogee (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The author is User:LLBooks, which appears to be the author's publisher, Leaping Lion Books. Woogee (talk) 03:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How is it a conflict of interest when I just listed factual information about him? The page isn't glowing with compliments. I think I remained quite unbiased. LLBooks (talk) 04:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I found two reviews of his first novel: Cabot Station in The New York Times and The Hour. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete I really wanted to keep this article when I saw that his first novel was reviewed (briefly) in the NYT. However, none of his subsequent books seem to have attracted any notice or significant reviews that I could find. By the way, the blurbs about each book (which sound like they are quoted directly from the book jacket) are inappropriate and un-encyclopedic. They do nothing to make me want to to keep this article. --MelanieN (talk) 02:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with MelanieN. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.