- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ultimate Taekwondo Federation
- Ultimate Taekwondo Federation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack or sourcing to support notability (see also Martial arts project review) Natet/c 12:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Natet/c 12:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Found no reliable sources and very little information of any kind. Only 9 total ghits on the organization's full name. Papaursa (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ORG and WP:MANOTE. zero gnews or gbooks returns. 14 actual ghits on the whole federation title, mostly WP and blogs. No evidence of significant coverage by reliable sources, which seems odd since the claim is that they are a large org. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.