- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, fails WP:BIO. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
UFO Phil
- UFO Phil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fail WP:BIO.The article contains no sources and I was not able to find any reliable source coverage of the subject. The article also appears to make overstated claims, one example is the article claim that he is a "regular on the nationally syndicated radio program Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, appearing frequently as a guest and contributor." The wikipedia article on Coast to Coast AM has a section about guests which he is not mentioned, he is instead mentioned in a section about callers. BlueAzure (talk) 00:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I looked around for some reliable sources and couldn't find any, so it looks like the subject fails WP:BIO. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep' no, just no--208.19.15.172 (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)— 208.19.15.172 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. .[reply]
- Strong Delete as article fails notability. I also note that it has been extensively edited over several years by an IP user with almost exclusive focus on this article and while the IP changes slightly over time it's always a Comcast account in Spokane, Washington, which is the home of "UFO Phil" who has an account but appears to be editing anonymously to circumvent WP:COI policies and disguise his true purpose. (Not cool.) - Dravecky (talk) 10:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment And I have now initiated a "Suspected sock puppets" case against Radiopeople. - Dravecky (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails notability. Just aren't sufficient reliable sources.--Rtphokie (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.