- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 02:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tze-Chiang Chen
- Tze-Chiang Chen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is being an IBM VP (which appears to be the most notable thing mentioned in the article) sufficient for notability? I don't think so. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 09:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable company bureaucrat. Qworty (talk) 10:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NOTRESUME. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable. Taiwantaffy (talk) 14:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as passing WP:PROF criterion 3, where IEEE fellowship is explicitly listed. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I agree that the IEEE Fellowship, rather than the IBM job title, is the most notable thing mentioned in the article. The article describes his contributions to the history of circuit technology and the IEEE Fellowship confirms that those contributions were significant. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.