- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tribune Digital
- Tribune Digital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. The article Tribune Company makes a lot of claims about Tribune Digital but none of these are cited. Marcus Qwertyus 22:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 23:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 23:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find coverage about key appointments in this division of the Tribune company such as this, and I can find press releases. What I cannot find is significant coverage in reliable sources to establish this as a notable division within the company. The current article is largely a link repository in violation WP:DIRECTORY. There is no content worth merging. -- Whpq (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.