- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Treworgey tree fayre
- Treworgey tree fayre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable event- could not find sources to determine notability, fails WP:EVENT. Slon02 (talk) 17:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because the event hasn't ben held since 1989 the internet content concerning this article is obviously sparse. There are, however notable sources referring to this event.[1] --Fletch 2002 (talk) 18:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There's no information on Treworgey Tree Fayre on the following site but it is notable enough to have been included on a ratings system with it's own dedicated page.[2] --Fletch 2002
(talk) 18:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This festival is also relevant to the band Hawkwind and I will see that it is referenced in on their Wikipedia page. Their set was filmed at the festival and is readily available on DVD[3] --Fletch 2002 (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Festival already referenced on the Hawkwind Page here --Fletch 2002 (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It sounds like a NN festival held once 21 years ago. We do not categorise performers by performance, and I do not think we only exceptionally have articles on individual concerts. However, that is what this article seeks to be. I might have suggested merging a summary to a nearby place (which?), but I doubt it is even worth that. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular talk 02:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.