- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Tors Peerson
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tors Peerson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG: references do not mention the subject, and subject's name appears to be an anagram of "storeperson", so probable hoax. Deus et lex (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Deus et lex (talk) 05:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Even if it is genuine, there's no evidence of notability. Mitch Ames (talk) 06:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence it is genuine - no mention in reliable sources about Walker or Callister, contains no sources. --Find bruce (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as a hoax. Only hits are WP mirrors. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Signs point to hoax – all content written by two accounts with similar names which have made no other edits; article is garnished with a few scant citations to look like it is referenced, but which don't refer to the subject at all, just some shipping news; no references to the subject found elsewhere other than WP mirrors; anagram of the name to occupation is suspicious (or a case of nominative determinism?). --Canley (talk) 00:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:BASIC, article sources do not actually back what is stated about Peerson, nothing found to even prove existance of this person, let alone they being wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Nika2020 (talk) 20:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Strong delete Likely hoax, even if subject existed, no evidence of notability. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.