- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Too Old To Date
- Too Old To Date (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of RS, non notable promo. I am concerned by the rev history, 5 or 6 IPs doing bulk improvment edits, which appear to be socks. L3X1 (distant write) 01:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distant write) 16:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distant write) 16:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distant write) 13:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distant write) 13:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 13:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 13:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sources are its own website, a press release, and an itunes listing. Not sufficient. ValarianB (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sources do not seem to be WP:RELIABLE MassiveYR ♠ 23:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I am not finding significant coverage to suggest that an article is warranted. Gongshow talk 08:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relisting, a request for closure has been filed, but so far is un-acted upon.
Relisting comment: final relisting, a request for closure has been filed, but so far is un-acted upon.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 11:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I have been unable to find any significant third party coverage for this topic.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability provided or found. AllyD (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.