- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 16:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Lodburaey (cyclist)
- Thomas Lodburaey (cyclist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable cyclist. Fails the general notability guideline, and fails WP:ATH as he hasn't competed at the highest amateur level. SeveroTC 07:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep winning the Tour de Pakistan seems notable to me. ϢereSpielChequers 10:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Tour of Pakistan is a very minor race and isn't organised every year so doesn't qualify as the highest amateur level of the sport. WP:ATH focusses upon the level competed at (rather than at the level success has been achieved at) and I don't see how he satisfies that? SeveroTC 16:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Tour of Pakistan is not even classified on the UCI Asia Tour, which is semi-pro. This is clearly not the fully professional level of the sport. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Biography of living person really needs reliable sources.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.