- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thinfeeder
- Thinfeeder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Iowateen (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 22:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: It seems little more than advertising, at most it could appear in a list somewhere else. Jwoodger (talk) 06:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, I don't even see any editorial reviews. Tiny but powerful doesn't equate with notablity. Drawn Some (talk) 00:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.