- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Benjamin Raubinsons
- The Benjamin Raubinsons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination. Contested prod, rationale was Makes a claim of notability, but no real evidence thereof. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google doesn't return much, and the second hit from the top is Wikipedia's copyright violations noticeboard, when it was dealing with a previous incarnation of this article. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:15, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Their Myspace page calls them the "self proclaimed founders of the 'attic rock' scene," and from my searching they're the only ones who do. In fact, it doesn't seems like anyone is really talking about this group at all, certainly not in "multiple non-trivial published works." No other notable achievements. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 10:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the two editors above; no real notability is asserted, and their only claim is to be a music band. I can think of plenty other small amateur small rock bands that have likewise failed Wikipedia:Notability (music) in this manner before. KaySL (talk) 15:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not finding any in-depth coverage; does not appear to meet WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 23:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I was the prodder. LadyofShalott 14:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no touring or other evidence this passes WP:BAND. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.