- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep - improper venue. Please use WP:MFD for talk pages that are to be deleted in isolation. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Piccadilly line extension to Cockfosters
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Talk:Piccadilly line extension to Cockfosters (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Piccadilly line extension to Cockfosters|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I would like to nominate this page to be merged into the Piccadilly line article as that basically sums up all the points in this article. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 12:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 12:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural close. Presumably you didn't mean to nominate the talk page of this article, but the article itself. In any case, you don't propose that the article should be deleted, so this is not for AfD. Per WP:MERGEPROP, put a proposal on Talk:Piccadilly line to suggest this. YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.