- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Steffne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP that fails general notability requirements. Being 19, an having authored some flash games as a sole source of notability is probably WP:TOOSOON. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Lacks GHits and GNEWs of substance. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 16:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 14:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Indeed the article qualifies for WP:TOOSOON, her works have not significantly impacted the gaming world yet. She may have done a lot a 19 years but no award worthy of note has even be given her yet. CrossTempleJay · talk 16:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of notability. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.