- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Choose Your Own Adventure books. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual Choose Your Own Adventure Books SilkTork *YES! 10:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Statue of Liberty Adventure
- Statue of Liberty Adventure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual Choose Your Own Adventure Books. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Statue of Liberty Adventure appears to be notable, and if it is not, the following sources demonstrate that it should be merged to its author's page Ellen Kushner. This Google News Archive search. See this article from The Providence Journal, this article from Orlando Sentinel, this article from Toronto Star, and this article from the Charlotte Observer. I searched through my library databases and was able to find a review from School Library Journal. Cunard (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added the School Library Journal review to Statue of Liberty Adventure. Cunard (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is a duplicate of the conversation occurring at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual Choose Your Own Adventure Books: I applaud your detective work here, but I do not find this evidence compelling. The reviews are essentially trivial and do not rise to that expected from WP:BK. ScienceApologist (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe that reviews in several newspapers and a journal demonstrate notability and pass WP:BK #1. Cunard (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- These seem to be no more than very off-handed mention -- including the School Library Journal mention. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe that reviews in several newspapers and a journal demonstrate notability and pass WP:BK #1. Cunard (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is a duplicate of the conversation occurring at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual Choose Your Own Adventure Books: I applaud your detective work here, but I do not find this evidence compelling. The reviews are essentially trivial and do not rise to that expected from WP:BK. ScienceApologist (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added the School Library Journal review to Statue of Liberty Adventure. Cunard (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.