- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 13:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Split My Taxi
- Split My Taxi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article about a start up with a few mentions but fails WP:CORP at this time. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 13:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It passes WP:CORP; it is covered by a site called Metro.us, which counts as a national source (in the Boston section). Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 15:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The provided sources are enough to establish notability and pass WP:GNG. I'm worried that it still reads like an advertisement but that's an issue for cleanup rather than deletion. §everal⇒|Times 16:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 18:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, already seeing good secondary source coverage, the cites just need some minor formatting. — Cirt (talk) 16:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The needed sources are already in the article. SL93 (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.