- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and salt. BD2412 T 05:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Siddiqui Subhani (Indian Entrepreneur)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Siddiqui Subhani (Indian Entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
paid for spam, move warred to mainspace about a non notable individual with no meaningful coverage. See also Siddiqui Subhani. Praxidicae (talk) 13:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as spammoid; block creator for edit-warring. serial # 15:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - seems like spam at first glance, and this suspicion is strengthened the more one delves into the topic. The article subject has accrued some coverage, but said coverage is poor quality. Take this source cited by the article; at first glance it may imply the subject has accured coverage, but on close inspection the source is revealed to be a five-sentence incoherent puff piece - the same can be said for this source. None of the sources cited imply the article subject has a claim to encyclopedic significance, nor is there any indication the subject is more than a run-of-the-WP:MILL businessperson/marketer. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - undisclosed, paid-for spam. MER-C 17:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Remark: Looking at the undisambiguated page, this has been deleted 4 times since 2016. Three times for A7, once for G11. 173.85.194.197 (talk) 17:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above rationale. Waggie (talk) 03:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - page has been deleted numerous times as per IP 2 posts above Spiderone 13:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and Indefinite block creation — The article is Run of the mill as SamHolt6 noted, and because it is continuously recreated, its creation should be blocked indefinite. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 06:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to note that - given this AfD was filed and has seen some participation - the article should not be speedied. In my opinion it is better to have a lasting discussion resulting a concrete consensus to delete the topic that just continually speedy deleting the article. A deletion here also opens this article to being deleted via a G4 speedy should it be recreated in the future. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- delete and salt, along with Siddiqui Subhani. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above --TheImaCow (talk) 20:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete and I agree with the suggestion to add salt: the subject fails ANYBIO by spades. ——Serial # 22:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.