- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Shailesh Digamber Singh
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shailesh Digamber Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The author of this article, Jeavinparklee, has a Conflict of interest. Firstly, his initial edit from his account on Vishvendra Singh has been reverted for "inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content".
Context: Vishvendra Singh joined the congress in 2008 over conflict with his party colleague Digamber Singh.
This user has made a lot of unsourced additions in-between properly cited additions to Digamber Singh in the last 7 days. And has created Dr. Digamber Singh Pro Kabaddi Tournament which has been moved to draft now. He has also created Dr. Digamber Singh ‘Samadhi’.
Secondly, This account has been only used to promote Digamber Singh and his family members till now. After a brief search, Shailesh Digamber Singh was previously created on 10 March 2023 and moved to draft on 11 March 2023 by an admin, Refer - Draft:Shailesh Digamber Singh. Now it looks like Jeavinparklee can be a sock of Af1grazel or Kirat sinh (Sock account already banned). All three accounts mentioned above have only been used to promote Digamber Singh and his family till now.
Thirdly, Shailesh Digamber Singh fails WP:N. There is no significant coverage of him. A simple Google search result shows not even a single reliable source discussing him except for trivial mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Out of the 6 sources cited in the article, only 2 of them are reliable, one discusses his loss against Vishvendra Singh and the other one is a trivial mention. Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Politics. Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete because the subject fails Wikipedia:Notability. However, first, I want to point out that the likely COI is not relevant here whatsoever; the notability is what matters. If he were notable, WP:ATD would suggest we fix the POV issues rather than deleting.
- But he's not notable, because he doesn't have SIGCOV in multiple sources. Here is a source assessment table:
Source assessment table: prepared by User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dainik Bhaskar | Yes. | ? It is unclear whether or not this newspaper is reliable enough for the English wiki. | Brief mention that he is running (not sufficient according to WP:NPOL. | ✘ No |
Hindustan Times | Yes. | Legit news organization. | Passing mention in an article about his dad. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
- Hey @IAmHuitzilopochtli, I mentioned the COI just to convey that he/she may be WP:PAID to do this. Jeraxmoira (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Being a son of known and notable leader doesn’t makes the subject notable themselves. The subject doesn’t passes WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. —— “Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi (talk) 13:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)”
- Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.