- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA1000 04:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Selling Instrumental Beats
- Selling Instrumental Beats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: Does not qualify.. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment see also WP:Articles for deletion/Anno Domini Beats. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: no references, all opinion, somewhat promotional. ubiquity (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO and per Ubiquity. Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: see also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/DarkSideBeats. Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Article creator has now been blocked for spamming: see SPI above. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -It seems to be a copyvio at very first glance. Anyway, it falls into WP:NOT guideline. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: spam. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.