- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sappo
- Sappo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little context, or content, pretty much a Dicdef, (see also Martial arts project review) Natet/c 12:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Natet/c 12:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--If you can't find a source that explains what this is, delete it.--Jarhed (talk) 07:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kappo, with which it is generally paired. This seems to be more detritus left over from when someone tried to add a separate page for every Danzan Ryu technique. See [1], [2]. JJL (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per discussion at Martial Arts project. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.