- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Saira Nisar
- Saira Nisar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject seems to be not sufficiently notable and is wroten with a tone that IMHO looks like promotional. It is linked to other 2 articles wroten by BP09Zahra: Tastemarket (See AFD) and Trademark Market (See AFD): both articles, that I've tagged with AFD, have the same problem of promotional tone related to Saira Nisar, notability and spelling. Dэя-Бøяg
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 2. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 00:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, but weak one; found a possible source here. My sense is the subject is an entrepreneur affiliated with a big trade show (?) in Britain called Trademark Event (?), but language problems (eg some sources from Pakistan) make it hard to verify; few in-depth treatments suggest she does not yet meet GNG but my guess is she may do so in future.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Subject does not meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.