- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 07:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Karofsky
- Robert Karofsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Marginally notable individual, half the article is about an unnotable event. ϢereSpielChequers 00:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because this article violates our policy on biographies of living people. This article seems to have been written to publicize a scandal. It also violates our policy on articles about one event. Wikipedia is not a tabloid newspaper. Cullen328 (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with above. --MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per above. Not seeing any claim of notability here. -LtNOWIS (talk) 10:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Information Control..... What an absolute shame. Power certainly corrupts and the power granted to the socially inept and friendless loners who wiki-monitor this site is limitless and often scary. Can we propose that these editors be renamed The Wiki-Ministry of Information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NICENICE (talk • contribs) 18:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.