- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A RM can still be filed Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Robber baron
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robber baron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural AfD; This was erroneously nominated at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Robber baron. Pinging @RuleTheWiki: for further comment. SK2242 (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- The reason given was "Disambiguation page not necessary for only 2 articles which can suitably reference each other with an {about} template". This should probably be a WP:RM to determine the primary topic, but since we're here: Keep, WP:NOPRIMARY, a helpful disambiguation page. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep for now - we would need a determined primary topic in order to have dual hatnotes. Hog Farm Talk 17:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above comments. SK2242 (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Probably should've listed it as a requested move, btw i thought it best to list it at Miscellany for Deletion because i didn't know if it was a normal article or something else. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.