- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfy. Moved to User:Lance Xavier/Raccoon Willie on suggestion from nominator (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Raccoon Willie
- Raccoon Willie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article fails to meet WP:NOT. Lack of significant coverage Bladeofgrass (talk) 09:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article does not establish notability. Theymos (talk) 10:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Author had a hard time understanding why his article was SD'ed and then PROD'ed, removed tags, etc. But regardless of that, he failed to establish notability completely, which is why it was SDed and PRODed. Off with Willie. §FreeRangeFrog 18:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy. Instead of throwing their work down the drain, we should try educating the newbie and give them a chance to try establish notability. If he is to appear on Animal Planet, the chance he's notable is present. - Mgm|(talk) 09:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy. This is a better idea. Bladeofgrass (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.