- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Public Interest Advocacy Centre
- Public Interest Advocacy Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non Notable non-profit law firm firm, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Mtking (edits) 22:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article does not even claim notability, much less demonstrate it. A Google News search find a few mentions in Toronto newspapers (as well as mentions of an identically-named firm in Australia, so the article title is not unique) but they are just that, mentions. There is no substantial coverage ABOUT the firm that I could find. --MelanieN (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.