- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I'll buy Silverseren's argument. Hopefully cleanup and expansion will commence. Shimeru (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Powwow Water
- Powwow Water (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable and badly-sourced subject. Google News search reveals only company results, nothing to establish notability. Parrot of Doom 22:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete GNews reveals trivial coverage, only thing of note appears to be that they are or were purchased by Nestle. Nothing to confer notability. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 23:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 04:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 04:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added a number of sources to the article. The Nestle thing is not the only thing they are notable for, there are other things, which I have put in as EL's. The company appears notable. SilverserenC 04:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep article can be improved, and now contains several external links that can be used as references. snigbrook (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable enough to rate an article in the New York Times - as well as mentions in other RS. Good work, SilverSeren. --MelanieN (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.