- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pinnatta
- Pinnatta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company with no reliable sources. Article is promotional in nature. I removed a hefty bit of unsourced promotional content after being unable to find any reliable sources. Basically, a small venture funded company with very little press coverage and no inherent notability. CitizenNeutral (talk) 02:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The software fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. No in depth coverage in any reliable sources that I could find. If the most notable thing about this software is that the company that created it secured venture capital, then the software is probably just not that special. - MrX 02:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I am not able to find a TechCrunch's article about the start-up or a review of Pinnatta mobile application, hence this software lacks notability and media coverage as per WP:NSOFTWARE. Toffanin (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.