- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atmoz (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Palaeoarchaeology
- Palaeoarchaeology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The creator of this article provides no evidence that this is an established science. Instead he is using it as a vehicle to link to articles about various landscape features where there is debate about whether they are man-made or natural (or in the case of the Bosnian pyramids have been thoroughly dismissed as natural). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Coment: This article has been vandalized several times by the user R. Haworth, this action is intentional and repeated, he has reduced the quality of this article several times. You can verify this information, please go to article and view history from June 19. 186.160.63.90 (talk) 03:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This article, Lady of Maali, Lady of Mali, and Supermegalith have been spammed several times by Juan L. Bacigalupo, using that account and using or influencing the users of various Peruvian IP Addresses matching 186.160/14, 190.43.160/19, and 190.81.128/17. — Jeff G. ツ 08:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There is only one user of Peru. Your statement about spam and various users Peruvians should be clarified conveniently; because this article was written with good intentions. Thank you. 186.160.54.73 (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see #IP Addresses below. — Jeff G. ツ 18:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
REDACTED REMOVAL per nom. Has insufficient verifiable references from reliable sources for the alleged science. — Jeff G. ツ 07:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]
- Keep given the changes by Uncle G (talk · contribs). — Jeff G. ツ 10:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with recent rewrite by UG. Perhaps rename/move to Paleolithic archeology or some "ae" spelling variant as that seems a more common term. Vsmith (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the user has indeed not provided sufficient evidence, but that does not mean that others cannot. Chaosdruid (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - This is a well established field of research (although it may not have many active archaeologists specialisng in palaeo- fields) Problems in the Archaeology and Paleoarchaeology of Northern, Eastern and Central Asia. [1] Dennis Stanford, a paleoarchaeologist at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, agrees Mammoth Park is a paleoarchaeological site. I also find it hard to believe that this was rushed through so quickly. Is it a problem with the spelling ? THis is the normal UK spelling and the US (and others) would be Paleoarchaeology. Misspellings would include Paleoarcheology though. Chaosdruid (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and merge with Prehistoric Archaeology.Biophys (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RfC on User:Juan L. Bacigalupo
- Comment by nominator. I know this is not the place to discuss user blocks but if I see consensus to block Juan L. Bacigalupo, I will happily withdraw this nomination in the light of the revised text by Uncle G. (The article is already protected from anon edits.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
port{Sup) block per RHaworth. — Jeff G. ツ 17:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not the place for a ban/block discussion, take that to WP:AN or WP:SPI given the ip edits. Vsmith (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's currently at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Juan_L._Bacigalupo. — Jeff G. ツ 19:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IP Addresses
IP Addresses in 186.160/14:
- 186.160.53.168 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.54.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.55.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.56.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.57.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.57.174 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.59.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.63.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 186.160.72.70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
IP Addresses in 190.43.160/19:
- 190.43.190.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
IP Addresses in 190.81.128/17:
- 190.81.173.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
— Jeff G. ツ 18:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.