- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Jump. SpinningSpark 19:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pajama na Kanojo
- Pajama na Kanojo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article of a manga that has not received adequate coverage in reliable third party sources and does not satisfy WP:BK. 十八 01:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --十八 01:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Jump. Not enough reliable coverage was found in either Japanese or English. However, since the title is a possible search term, the content can probably be merged to the List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Jump article (which itself needs work). Still, the manga isn't notable enough to warrant a separate article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Redirecting to List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Jump. --雛鳥 (talk) 13:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Search for reliable sources isn't coming up with anything beyond booksale rankings, illegal scanlations, and a couple of blog postings. But that is not enough to pass either WP:NOTE's or WP:BK's criteria for inclusion. —Farix (t | c) 19:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Jump, without merging any content. The series doesn't seem to have enough coverage to support an article, but since it is listed in that list, I don't see any reason why not to redirect to the list. Calathan (talk) 03:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.