- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep and move to Oklahoma Military Department. JForget 01:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oklahoma Department of the Military
- Oklahoma Department of the Military (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After checking for significant coverage in reliable sources I have found none. SaltyBoatr (talk) 02:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I am assuming that the information in this article comes directly from the department itself. A major agency in a United States state seems like it should be notable enough, and its official website a reliable enough source. Borock (talk) 02:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to make assumptions, when I looked there didn't seems to be an actual "Oklahoma department of the military". SaltyBoatr (talk) 04:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename to Oklahoma Military Department, which appears to be the correct name of the department.[1] 482 GHits and 267 GBooksHits for the search string <Oklahoma "Military Department">; sufficient secondary coverage of the department and its activities, for example [2] [3][4] [5]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename per Arxiloxos. A cabinet-level department in a first-level national subdivision is enough for notability, and this oen unquestionably exists. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename this is needed as a overall article for the Oklahoma Army National Guard, Air National Guard, State Defence Force, and other security forces. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.