- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nutso bongo
- Nutso bongo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Made-up phrase; why a speedy was declined is anyone's guess. Another editor prodded it but I think an AfD would be better because it seems like winter is here already. Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 09:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. @Erpert, you certainly have the right to remove the PROD (I added it) and nominate this for deletion, but your original speedy delete tag, WP:CSD#G1, was unjustified. The article is not nonsense as that term is defined by G1 ("incoherent text or gibberish") "In short, if you can understand it, G1 does not apply."--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO; no coverage found about this term. Gong show 15:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.