- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 04:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to Lose (novel)
- Nothing to Lose (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Contested PROD but non-notable per WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 00:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Numerous reviews from major news sources clearly shows the notability of this book (and the series, for that matter). A clear example of an utter lack of WP:BEFORE #9 by nominator. SilverserenC 00:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This AfD is merely one of a very large number of deletions flagged by a certain editor and looks (like 99% of the rest) pretty dubious. QuipQuotch (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong KeepSadads (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.