- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nokia N79
- Nokia N79 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable commercial product. No references provided to substantiate notability; no claim of notability given. Article is blatant advertising--just a copy of a spec sheet. Listing for afd after prod template removed without comment or improvement. Mikeblas (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nokia announces an addition to Nseries Multimedia Phones and an article pops up. Wikipedia is not a mirror site for the Nokia website, nor is it a catalog of every technogadget offered for sale. Fails WP:N due to lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Nokia is a notable company in the celphone business, so I have no objection to an article which lists their models with tabulated features, since collectively they have been covered enough to establish notability for the line. Edison2 (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Blatant advertising, copy/paste from another website. The Flying Spaghetti Monster! 16:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE or cite multiple independent, reliable sources. Yes, any mass market product is "notable" in a sense, but Wikipedia is not the place to indiscriminately post product announcements. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.