- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Nerd sniping
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nerd sniping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a neologism. Valereee (talk) 20:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Valereee (talk) 20:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:NOTDICT "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, phrasebook, or a slang, jargon, or usage guide." Also MOS:NEO "(Neologisms) ... should generally be avoided because their definitions tend to be unstable and many do not last." — Maile (talk) 01:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete for lacking GNG. There is no WP:SIGCOV, no WP:PERSISTENCE, no indication at all that this term is discussed as a a term in scholarly literature. It appears to fall under WP:NOTNEO and, even if it weren't a neologism, it would be barred through WP:DICTDEF. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment There may or may not be enough coverage of the term to mention it at xkcd, in which case this should redirect there. TompaDompa (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - This is just a dictionary definiton. Please see WP:NOTDICT. Even if it were expanded upon to be more than just a definition, the subject doesn't meet the GNG (see WP:Notability). While a few sources outside xckd have mentioned Nerd Sniping, they're essentially just saying the definition, and not enough of those sources meet the criteria for reliability. Combustible Vulpex (talk) 11:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.