- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 23:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nam Yang Pugilistic Association
- Nam Yang Pugilistic Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a non-notable martial arts organization. According to the article there are only 4 schools. In addition, I can find no third party references or anything that makes this school notable according to WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Papaursa (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have been unable to find independent and reliable sources to support notability. Janggeom (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A small, local group that makes no claim to notability. Google has little to offer [1]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.