- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Muhammad Wala
- Muhammad Wala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found this page at the end of the backlog of WP:NPP and tried to source it. The page claims that Muhammad Wala is in Chiniot District. However, the government of Pakistan thinks that in Chiniot district there are only Jan Muhammad Wala (which is likely mentioned in the article as Than Muhammad Wala), and Khan Muhammad Wala, which already has an article. Given that all info is unsourced and thus not credible, that coordinates do not lead to any locality called Muhammad Wala, and that the author is indeffed, I believe this article contains no useful information and should be deleted. Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - apart from the factual doubts raised in the nomination, this article seems to be largely a vehicle for self-promotion by Usman Nadeem, now indef-blocked as MaanRoy (talk · contribs) and again as Mannadeem (talk · contribs). JohnCD (talk) 20:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.