- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD G11 BethNaught (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Mononlogue (Brand)
- Mononlogue (Brand) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spammy article about a one-year old Russian company that is not likely to meet WP:CORP. eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom: the SPA creator may also represent a COI. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I've just noticed that there's also a disparity between the spelling of the page name and the text: Mononlogue / Monologue. If the consensus is to keep the article, it will probably require a page move. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not notable Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (propose speedy G11): An indigestible lump of WP:SPA advertising: "MONOLOGUE is all about the infallible integrity of style, in which austere silhouettes and exquisite décor mutually complement each other ...Our exacting approach", blah blah. Product placement to serve the company, not the encyclopaedia. AllyD (talk) 14:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.