- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 18:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Mike M. Liskany
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mike M. Liskany (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography, tagged as unreferenced since 2007 without ever having a single reference added, of a person notable only as a city councillor. As always, city councillors are not handed the same guaranteed inclusion rights that state or national legislators get -- a city councillor has to either (a) serve in a global city on the order of NYC, Chicago, LA, Toronto or London, or (b) be sourceable to a volume and depth and range of coverage that marks him out as a special case over and above most other city councillors. But neither of those things are true here at all, and there's no strong evidence that he has preexisting notability for other reasons either. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to actually pass WP:GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete or possibly redirect to Politics of Dayton, Ohio. Single-term city councillor, not even sure a redirect is needed. valereee (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete articles lacks any references.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - appears to fail NPOL and Bearcat's analysis is convincing. - Sitush (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.