- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 21:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Cousens
- Michael Cousens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The person is a non notable player in a semi-professional league. Fails WP:Athlete. Jevansen (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet WP:ATHLETE. The West Australian Football League is neither fully professional or the highest level of the sport. Given that there are no project specific guidelines developed for players in this competition and no sources have been provided, there is little else to go on. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It doesn't matter about the WAFL argument. This person has not achieved anything notable even at that level. Fails WP:N as a result. AFL-Cool (talk) 01:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Certain WAFL players - eg winners of the Sandover Medal, or players pre-1990 when the AFL was instituted, would have claims to notability, but not in this instance. Murtoa (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.